When I sat down to read Esther Dhanraj’s new memoir, titled Unbaptized: Why I Left Christianity and Returned to my Roots(Garuda Prakashan, 2025; 316 pp.), I thought that I knew a fair bit about Christianity and its history in India, particularly in the Telugu states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. Apart from the fact that Andhra Pradesh is my ancestral homeland, I have also done academic research on American missionaries from my alma mater, Gettysburg College, who traveled to Andhra Pradesh over a century and a half to harvest souls. I also conducted research on Christianity in modern-day Andhra Pradesh, which culminated in a capstone paper that analyzed the centrality of culture in the proselytizing framework. In the course of my own study, I quickly understood that the sources documenting the missionary’s perspective — diaries, memoirs, letters, and newspaper articles, to name just a few — dwarfed those that documented the converts’ experience. How willing were they, for instance, to leave their ancestral faith behind in favor of this new religion? What were the fears, insecurities, and sorrows that may have plagued them? There is scant material in the historical record to answer these questions, for, after all, history is written by the victors, and it would not have behooved the missionaries to record such things that may have contradicted their salvific narrative.
In the discourse surrounding Christian missionary activity in India today, the converts’ perspective is not always given the primacy it deserves. Some derisive portrayals make the converts out to be “sheep” that have meekly surrendered to the Church and are bereft of free will or independent thinking; they are simply seen as pawns in a game much larger than their ordinary existences. Or, as Dhanraj herself points out, they are called “ricebags,” people who lack sophistication and cannot see beyond simple material inducements. To infantilize these converts through such portrayals obscures their stories and their humanity, something that we must consciously desist from.
Part of the difficulty, too, in properly appreciating converts’ true perspective is that those who have converted and are still in the faith often give “testimonies” that are trumpeted by pastors and missionaries to encourage more converts; thus, the objectivity of these pronouncements is very much questionable. Further, those who have exited Christianity — Extians, as Dhanraj terms them — are often loath to speak out. As Dhanraj narrates from her own experience, they often apprehend (and receive) tremendous blowback from their own former brothers and sisters in the faith.
It is in this context that the reader should approach Unbaptized. It sheds light on a perspective that the public does not often hear. Further, as Dhanraj underscores, Unbaptized is an “Indian story” and is thus uniquely positioned to tell the story of Christianity in a uniquely Bhāratīya context, as opposed to a Western one. Reading Unbaptized highlights the fact that an observer cannot attain a complete understanding of Christianity in India today without appreciating the vantage point of someone who has both entered and emerged from the faith.
Unbaptized by Esther Dhanraj
Dhanraj begins her account by narrating the circumstances in which her family entered into Christianity, forsaking their ancestral Hindu faith and practice. At this juncture in the story, a young Dhanraj very much comes across as the proverbial girl next door; her middle-class family, situated in Hyderabad, was quite unremarkable, all things considered. Dhanraj skillfully narrates how her family was initially exposed to Christianity amidst the backdrop of tragedy and how, over time, they finally became part of the faith. What is striking in Dhanraj’s telling of these events is how the seemingly indefatigable efforts of the proselytizer brush up against the unsupported resistance of the proselytized. In other words, the proselytizer can fail a hundred times, but the cumulative effect of their labors, supported by an organized ecosystem and often powered by foreign funding, is enough to topple the resistance of their target on the hundred and first attempt. Dhanraj ably demonstrates that the initial process of proselytization in an Indian context is often not grounded in doctrinal preaching; rather, it is founded in quenching a very real desire for material and psychological solace that the potential convert’s Hindu co-religionists have been unwilling or unable to address. Dhanraj identifies this crucial lacuna in the existing Hindu ecosystem and calls for addressing it.
Dhanraj then proceeds to narrate how she personally became invested in Christianity, over and above her parents’ conversion; how she was led to believe that she was “chosen” to play a unique role in the Church, and how she was even evangelized by children her age. Simultaneously, her parents became more and more deeply rooted in Christianity even as its initial allure began to fade. One particularly memorable incident that Dhanraj recounts is the sudden passing of one of her brothers from complications stemming from Type 1 diabetes. He died even though he was only in his twenties and was baptized. Dhanraj nods to the irony of the moment; if her brother died when he was Hindu, proselytizers would likely have used the event as fodder to underscore the powerlessness of Hindu deities and Jesus’ salvific powers. Yet, now that the family was Christian, the pastor who was ministering to Dhanraj’s family milked the tragedy as an opportunity to extirpate one of the last remnants of the family’s Hindu identity, namely her grandmother’s pūjā mandira.Another anecdote that Dhanraj mentions, later in the book, concerns her mother being pressured to remove her tilakam, a deeply personal symbol of a Hindu woman’s identity.
This sort of brazen opportunism, which Dhanraj repeatedly writes of, particularly at moments of tragedy, is one of the most disturbing elements of her memoir. It emerges again when Dhanraj’s father was on his deathbed, suffering from COPD, and privately voiced to her doubts about Christianity that had haunted him throughout his life, after he had converted. As Dhanraj, a dutiful Christian at the time, reckoned with her father’s piercing questions, she was goaded on by the pastor counseling her family to encourage her father to “let go” — in essence, to give up his fight for life.
It is doubt — the very doubt that Dhanraj’s father wrestled with in his final moments — that drove her in her own re-examination of her Christian faith. Her zeal to become a Christian apologist and to defend her faith with theological rigor led her to a seminary in the United States, where she pursued a Master’s in Divinity degree. And it is in this process of formal study, Dhanraj tells us, that she realized that Christianity had fundamental doctrinal inconsistencies and gaps that led her to renounce the faith. Dhanraj’s telling is greatly enriched by her accessible discussion of various theological concepts in Christianity, which is quite beneficial for a lay reader who is unfamiliar with the faith’s doctrinal contours. Her explanations reveal her scholarly knowledge, and the works that she cites in her footnotes are useful references for those who want to further study the points she raises. Regardless of whether the reader agrees with Dhanraj’s theological views, her intellectual honesty and clarity of thought are admirable. Though Dhanraj’s initial entry into Christianity had little to do with theology and doctrine, these factors were the very impetus for her exit from the faith.
As Dhanraj acknowledges, others have, over the centuries, reckoned with the same theological questions that she poses but have still remained Christians. However, one cannot help but think, after reading her narrative, that if she had been exposed to Christianity’s theological foundations at the outset, when her family was initially presented with the option of converting, she could have made an informed decision about whether to adopt the faith. Perhaps this is a proposition that any reasonable person reading Dhanraj’s narrative, Christians included, can agree with. This is, in my view, one of the key messages from the book: when entering into a faith, religious inquiry and doubt should be welcomed, not squelched. Dhanraj explains how, after a period where she was an “Extian” and struggled to find her own identity in the aftermath of shedding her former faith, she found that her ancestral Hindu faith offered her the opportunity to undertake a genuine intellectual inquiry.
This brings Dhanraj’s story full circle, in that she found her way back to the very roots that her family had severed its connection with, in adopting Christianity. Anyone seeking a serious understanding of Christianity in India should read her memoir. The fact that it is written in English, as opposed to Telugu or another Bhāratīya language, means that her story has a larger potential audience beyond India alone. Christians outside of India who are contributing money to “save souls” in Bhārata through their own parishes would do well to educate themselves about the havoc that their perhaps well-intentioned donations are wreaking. Indeed, Dhanraj’s story is one that the world needs to hear, for no one, regardless of their faith background, should countenance the trauma and cruelty that religious conversion caused her family and others like them.
One of the key planks of postcolonialist discourse today is foregrounding the voices of those who have traditionally been marginalized and ignored. Dhanraj’s work is an important step in that direction. Her voice is an important and powerful contribution in the areas of religious freedom and human rights, one that is worthy of serious consideration.
Svayambodha and Shatrubodha by Pankaj Saxena offers a vital framework for Hindus to understand their true identity and civilizational threats, a crucial guide in our current civilizational moment.
We owe a lot to our mothers and grandmothers, who carry forth traditions year after year diligently. In the case of Chath, it involves fasting for more than thirty six hours and standing in cold water, all for the wellbeing of their family. Even amidst apathy towards culture by many, Chaṭh gives me hope.
A review of Nithin Sridhar’s Chatuh Ślokī Manusmṛti - An English Commentary, which is a bold and meticulous book that confronts popular misreadings and dispels inherited prejudices. A reclamation of the Dharmaśāstra tradition through a lucid and unapologetically śāstrika lens.
The Hindu conception of art is diametrically opposite to the movies being made today. This piece analyses the the abuse of art in the 2021 movie Shyam Singha Roy.